Saturday, August 2, 2014

Now JHP. Since FMJ described as humanitarian, it is worth mentioning that the JHP is not - at least

Ammunition in self-defense hidden - Access | Portal hidden oBroni.pl
The first is that if a particular weapon powered ammunition is capable of inflicting a serious wound, even leading to the death, it is effective ammunition. ("Pretty keyhole" and nothing more need) And so it uses only full mantle of ammunition (FMJ).
Apparently my expectations and those who adhere to this opinion developed special ammunition for self-defense, which the projectile when hit in the soft tissue increases its caliber. Full Mantle missile with a recess apex (shortcut JHP), is now very popular and praised for good strength refuting. Of course there is still a lot of different special missiles - including without coat, but you have to admit that I think most talk about JHP ...
The advantage of FMJ is humanity - so yes - humanitarianism. With this, we are humane to the attacker, forgetting about yourself hidden and why we carry this piece of metal ejection lead. We ask damage to a smaller area of the body, the bullet does not communicate its energy, hidden it is rather hidden a tendency to go through the pass-through - especially the stronger ammunition (eg 7.62 x 25) penetration is of course an advantage and a big advantage if you shoot at an armored target, but in an urban environment, where presumably there are many bystanders, the bullet piercing pass through can be dangerous for those just bystanders. Rebounds also can play a dramatic role. I come to the conclusion that more at this harm than good.
Now JHP. Since FMJ described as humanitarian, it is worth mentioning that the JHP is not - at least not to the attacker ... well bullet emits energy in the target, causing shock and extensive damage. Tends to grzybkowania - is in order; is less likely to suffer bystanders. The ability to rebound is also smaller.
Of course, not everything is so rosy. Effective armored shocks is to have a lot harder, but frankly hard to imagine a situation in which the person defending himself (individual) must shoot the bad guy protected hidden decent bulletproof vest. If so, it does not mean that the JHP will be quite worthless. Even if the bullet did not penetrate the vest it and so give a fairly large energy you sure striker will feel. No - it does not give us confidence that this goal will be effectively struck (in the case of FMJ effectiveness of the rule is greater), but if you expect aggression from armored targets, the "lathe" pattern. 33 will be our optimal. If we approach the matter of protection of personal real - never mentions the gun for self-defense TT ...
At the end of this pilot article on self-defense ammunition is worth mentioning that, as in any case - if anything is to work it must be good. History has shown that the ammunition from the apical cavity can be completely ineffective - yes, I mean even the "Miami Shootout" from the 80's. hidden Similarly, you can find some analogy to pełnopłaszczówek, which you've probably already saved people's lives and health, respectively striker backfired effectively.
The conclusion is that if you decide to use special ammo, let it be ammunition reputable company, not the proverbial company hidden "Bush". Of course for the company as we always have to pay extra, hidden but if a man's life - OUR life is worth the dozens of gold, which will save on the cartridges? hidden Do not ... fuck.
I wondered for a moment whether to put a comment below ... Author writes about amu and weapons, which we can use in an act of self-defense; accordance with the law. The best weapon for self-defense from a distance of 5 to 10 meters a sawed-off shotgun ammunition loaded crafted. Top doctored (niefabryczna!) loftka or cut nails. Shot, the area of destruction is to cover the entire attacker, hidden therefore, possible ballistic plates and Kevlar assailant are not critical, as the shot of the two barrels of the foot strikes the skull. And knocks. I shot this in the U.S. - the consequences of opening fire with something like this impressive efficiency. Of course in the USA such a weapon is prohibited de jure (legal regulations concerning the length of the barrel shotgun).
Well, unfortunately, for the self-defense can not afford, but in addition to legal restrictions, there are also disadvantages - Golf destruction such grapeshot 'will not ensure the safety of unauthorized, emptying hidden both tubes of said shotgun in one goal, we are rather confident that the striker will not survive, and not always the situation forces to inflict such damage. For this the recoil and the need to charge after each volley. I think that such a weapon would be effective, but inconvenient and dangerous. I have read not one article on rifles (after

No comments:

Post a Comment